STEM Talent Action Individual opportunity. Shared prosperity.

For newly elected governors and transition teams · October 2026

What Governors Can Do: Automatic Enrollment in Advanced Math

Making advanced math the default for students who have already earned it on the state test — at modest cost, within one to two school years.

On this page
  1. The problem
  2. What the evidence shows
  3. Where states stand
  4. Action 1: Executive order
  5. Action 2: Make it law
  6. Action 3: SEA policy
  7. Action 4: Publish the gap
  8. Action 5: Past Algebra
  9. First 100 days
  10. Anticipated questions
  11. Resources

Bottom line for governors

A new governor can put thousands more high-scoring students into advanced math within one to two school years, at modest cost, by making advanced math the default for students who have already earned it on the state test. Eleven states have enacted some form of automatic enrollment, five of them in 2026 alone, in states led by Republicans, Democrats and divided governments, and most passed by wide bipartisan margins. Most states still let referrals, requests and course availability decide who takes Algebra I in 8th grade, the usual path to calculus by 12th grade and to degrees in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM).

Five actions a governor and transition team can take

  1. Sign an executive order in the first 30 days.Direct the state education agency (SEA) to publish placement data, issue opt-out guidance and use existing federal flexibilities. No legislation is needed for any of these.
  2. Make it law in the first session.Propose automatic enrollment legislation. Action 2 links to model bills from ExcelinEd and ALEC and to design guidance from EdTrust.
  3. Set SEA policy for districts.Require universal screening on the existing state test, standard parent notices and compacted middle school pathways.
  4. Publish the gap.Report every year how many top scorers are placed in advanced math, by school, district and student group, including family income and rural status.
  5. Extend the pipeline past Algebra.Use governor's schools, dual enrollment and state math competitions to keep top students moving.

The problem: ready students are left out

58%

of schools in a 22-state sample offer algebra in 8th grade (NWEA, 2025)

20,000

New York 7th graders scored proficient but were not in Algebra 1 the next year (EdTrust-NY, 2026)

10x

more likely to become an inventor if born to a top-1% family than a below-median one, at similar early scores (Bell, Chetty et al., 2019)

In most states, a strong score on the state math test does not guarantee a seat in advanced math. Placement usually depends on teacher recommendations, parent requests and whether the school offers the course at all. As a result, capable students, especially from low-income and rural families, are passed over more often than equally ready classmates, both in placement decisions and because their schools do not offer the course.

The cost shows up in the state's future workforce. Children from families in the top 1% of income are 10 times as likely to become inventors as children from families below the median, and differences in 3rd-grade math scores explain less than a third of that gap. That points to lost opportunity rather than lost ability (Bell, Chetty et al., Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019).

What automatic enrollment is, and what the evidence shows

10% → 2%

top-scoring North Carolina 7th graders left out of Math I, before the 2018 law and in 2023 (Johns Hopkins, 2024)

40% → 70%

share of Wake County, NC students in accelerated math after an objective placement rule replaced referrals (Dougherty et al., 2015)

2x

girls earning a STEM bachelor's degree after entry to an accelerated middle school math track in a large Florida district (Card & Giuliano, 2024)

Automatic enrollment changes the default: a student who scores at or above a set level on the existing state math test is placed in the next advanced course unless a parent opts out. Teachers and parents can still recommend students who fall below the cutoff. No new test is needed, and the same number of students is taught. Johns Hopkins researchers expect the main costs to be short-term teacher training and, where a course is missing, a virtual or dual-enrollment option (Johns Hopkins, 2024).

The studies so far point the same way: more ready students are placed, gaps between equally skilled students shrink, and grades hold steady.

StudySettingFinding
Plucker, Berg & Kuwayama (Johns Hopkins, 2024)North Carolina, statewide law (2018)Top-scoring 7th graders not placed in Math I fell from about 10% before the law to 2% in 2023. In 2023-24, 94% of 58,186 eligible students in grades 6-12 were placed.
Dougherty et al. (Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2015)Wake County, NC, objective placement ruleThe share of students in accelerated math rose from about 40% to nearly 70%. The gap between low-income and other students with the same scores fell from 10.5 to 2-3 percentage points.
Dougherty et al. (Economics of Education Review, 2017)Wake County, NC, follow-upAcceleration raised later Precalculus enrollment by about one-seventh and improved college readiness.
Austin, Backes, Goldhaber et al. (CALDER/AIR, 2024)Washington, district policies before the 2019 statewide lawAdvanced course enrollment rose across subject areas. Qualified students from groups less likely to take advanced courses began to catch up, and GPAs and on-time graduation held steady.
Card & Giuliano (NBER, 2024)Large urban Florida district, test-score cutoff for an accelerated trackTrack entry raised algebra by 8th grade by about 20 percentage points and calculus enrollment by about 7 points. It nearly doubled the share of girls earning a STEM bachelor's degree.
E3 Alliance testimony (2024)Texas, statewide law (2023)Had the policy been in place earlier, an estimated 52,099 more 8th graders would have been placed in advanced math pathways in 2024-25 alone.

Where states stand

Eleven states have enacted automatic enrollment in some form since North Carolina enacted the first statewide requirement in 2018, and eight of them did so in 2025 or 2026. Designs differ mainly on the cutoff (proficient, the top performance level, or the top 25-40% statewide), the starting grade and whether the requirement applies only "if available."

Source: enacted state laws listed in the table below, as of October 30, 2026.
StateLawWho is automatically enrolledGradesNotes
ArizonaHB 2423 (2026)Highest proficiency on the state test or an aligned benchmark6-8Applies "if available"; parent may object
GeorgiaHB 1030, Math Matters Act (2026)Top ("distinguished") score on state end-of-grade or end-of-course test6-10Starts 2027-28; also requires 60 minutes of daily math in grades 4-5
IowaSF 2220 (2026)Advanced score on the grade 5-7 math test (pathway); advanced score plus a district readiness finding (next course)Pathway from grade 5; next course in grades 4-12Applies from 2027-28; Algebra I by grade 9 at the latest; covers math and English language arts
OhioSB 19 (2026)"Advanced" score, or "accomplished" plus an A/B or diagnostic score4-8Qualifying 6th graders take a compacted 7th/8th-grade course in grade 7, then Algebra I in grade 8; placements begin 2027-28
TennesseeSB 2375 / HB 2276 (2026)"Exceeds expectations" on 7th-grade TCAP math8Algebra I (or equivalent) in grade 8 starting 2027-28; parent may opt out in writing; adds math licensure pathways
IndianaHEA 1634 (2025)"Above proficient" on ILEARN plus a C or betterMiddle schoolStarts 2026-27
VirginiaHB 2686 (2025)Top quartile statewide on math SOL5-8Applies if the course is offered; requires additional pathways in and annual parent notice
KentuckyHB 190 (2025)District may enroll "distinguished" scorers4-12 (district option)Permissive, not required
TexasSB 2124 (2023)Top 40% on grade 5 STAAR, or a local measure6In effect since 2024-25
WashingtonHB 1599 (2019)Meets state standardHigh schoolAll districts since 2021-22; math, English language arts and science
North CarolinaHB 986 (2018)Highest level on end-of-grade or end-of-course test6+ (advanced learning in 3-5)A 2019 amendment added an annual state placement report

Model policies are available from ExcelinEd and ALEC, and EdTrust supports the approach, so the policy has backing from organizations across the spectrum.

Action 1Sign an executive order in the first 30 days

An executive order can start the work months before a bill passes: it can direct state agencies to measure the gap, guide districts and use federal funds the state already receives. In states where the chief state school officer is elected or answers to a state board, the same directives can be framed as requests or a joint agreement.

The order should direct the SEA and partner agencies to:

Action 2Make it law in the first session

A statute makes the default permanent and statewide; guidance alone leaves placement to each district. The strongest laws set an objective cutoff, start early enough to reach Algebra I by grade 8, close the "if available" exemption and require public reporting.

ProvisionRecommended designPrecedent
Who qualifiesHighest performance level on the state math test, or top 25% statewide, whichever reaches more students. Districts may add local measures that qualify more students, never fewer.NC (highest level), VA (top quartile), TX (top 40%)
WhenScreen every year in grades 3-8 and high school. The key decision is at the end of grade 5, into a compacted grade 6 course.TX (grade 5 to 6), OH (grades 4-8)
PathwayEach district offers a sequence that lets qualified students finish Algebra I by the end of grade 8.ExcelinEd model, OH
Course availabilityNo "if available" exemption. A school without the course provides it through the state virtual school, dual enrollment or a nearby school, phased in over two years.AZ and VA apply only where the course is available
Parent choiceParent may opt out in writing. Parent or teacher may opt a student in.Opt-out in nearly all enacted states; opt-in routes vary (e.g., TX, VA, ExcelinEd and ALEC models)
Family noticePlain-language notice in commonly spoken languages explaining the pathway and how to opt out.AZ, GA, ExcelinEd model
Student supportsExtra help during the school day, such as tutoring or small-group instruction.ExcelinEd model, GA
TestingAccelerated grade 8 students take the end-of-course test instead of the grade-level test.ESEA Section 1111(b)(2)(C); Arkansas waiver (grades 5-8)
ReportingAnnual public report by school, district and student group: eligible, placed, opted out, course not offered, and course results.NC, VA, ExcelinEd model

Model legislation

Start from one of the two published model bills, and check it against EdTrust's design guidance. ExcelinEd and ALEC offer ready-to-file bill text; EdTrust offers design principles rather than bill text.

ModelPublisherWhat it doesUse it for
Guaranteed Access to Advanced Math Model Policy (2024), with FAQ and 2026 one-pagerExcelinEdRequires a middle school pathway that ends in Algebra I. Automatically enrolls students who score proficient or higher on the grade 5, 6 or 7 state test, or meet a local measure. Parents can opt out or opt in. Requires in-school supports and an annual report to the legislature by student group.Bill text for a middle school math requirement
Middle School Advanced Math Course Requirements Act (finalized August 2026)ALECRequires districts to offer Algebra I to all middle school students, with completion by grade 9. Automatically enrolls students who score at a set level on the grade 5, 6 or 7 state test. Parents can opt out or opt in. Requires parent notice and an annual SEA report to the legislature.Bill text that pairs automatic enrollment with a universal Algebra I offering
Automatic Enrollment Policies for Advanced Coursework and fact sheetEdTrustSix conditions for success: a clear, data-backed rationale; yearly data; early family communication; multiple eligibility measures; starting before high school; and extending beyond math.Checking any bill's design and reporting provisions

Action 3Set SEA policy for districts

Much of what makes automatic enrollment work happens in SEA rules and guidance, which a governor can shape through appointments, the state board and the agency's budget. The SEA should set these expectations for districts:

  1. Universal screening on the existing state test. Review every student's score, not only referred students, and send each school its list of qualified students before spring scheduling. Consider local norms as an added route in for schools that score below the state average.
  2. Default placement with parent opt-out. Publish a model local policy and a plain-language parent notice that districts can adopt as is.
  3. A standard compacted pathway. Define course codes for a grade 6 or 7 compacted course that leads to Algebra I by grade 8, as Ohio now requires.
  4. Many routes in, one route out. Teacher recommendation, parent request and local measures can add students; only a parent can remove a qualified student.
  5. Credit by exam and mastery-based progression. Let students who show mastery of a course move on to the next one in that subject, including in elementary grades.
  6. Virtual and part-time enrollment. Let students who finish the most advanced course at their school take the next one online or at another school or college.

Action 4Publish the gap and reward growth at the top

Public reporting is one of the least expensive accountability tools a governor has. North Carolina's annual placement report showed district placement rates ranging from 33% to 100% of qualified students, showing the state where to focus help (Johns Hopkins, 2024). Publishing how many top scorers reach Algebra I the next year shows where placement is falling short.

Action 5Extend the pipeline past Algebra

Algebra I in grade 8 is the gateway, not the goal. Governors can also widen the routes that carry top students further.

First 100 days: checklist for transition teams

The sequence below gets a bill drafted, the data public and the first placements under way before next school year's schedules are set in spring.

Transition (before inauguration)

  • Ask the SEA how many students scored at the top level on the latest state math test and how many took advanced math the next year.
  • Check whether the state already has an automatic enrollment law and whether it is being followed.
  • List which middle schools do not offer Algebra I in grade 8.
  • Name a senior advisor to own the issue.

Days 1-30

  • Sign the executive order (Action 1).
  • Brief education committee chairs and the state board chair in both parties.
  • Include automatic enrollment in the State of the State and the first budget.

Days 31-60

  • File the bill (Action 2), starting from the ExcelinEd or ALEC model bill and the state's own test levels.
  • Ask the SEA to draft the model local policy and parent notice.
  • Meet superintendents from districts with the largest and smallest placement gaps.

Days 61-100

  • Publish the first placement-gap report.
  • Launch or expand the virtual course option for schools without Algebra I.
  • Send each district its list of qualified students before course scheduling for next year.

Anticipated questions and responses

These questions come up in nearly every state, and states that have already acted have answers to each.

"Is this an unfunded mandate?"

The same number of students is taught. Johns Hopkins researchers expect the main costs to be short-term teacher training and online options where a course is missing (Johns Hopkins, 2024).

"Will students be pushed too fast and fail?"

Only students who already scored at the top are placed. In Washington, advanced enrollment rose with no drop in GPAs or on-time graduation (AIR, 2024).

"Does it take away local control?"

Parents keep the final say through opt-out, and teachers and districts can still add students. The law only removes the barriers that keep qualified students out.

"What if our schools don't offer the course?"

Pair the requirement with a statewide virtual option and a two-year phase-in, and report which schools lack the course.

"Does acceleration hurt students socially?"

Research syntheses find academic gains and small-to-moderate social-emotional gains from acceleration (A Nation Empowered, Vol. 2, Ch. 2).

"Does it mean more testing?"

It uses the state test students already take, and accelerated students can take the end-of-course test instead of the grade-level one.

"Why not remove advanced tracks so everyone takes the same course?"

Removing advanced options leaves families who can pay for tutoring or private school to accelerate on their own. Automatic enrollment widens access while keeping the option for every ready student.

Resources

Every resource below is public and linkable as of October 30, 2026. Enacted state laws are linked in the table under "Where states stand."

ResourcePublisherTypeUse it for
Guaranteed Access to Advanced Math Model PolicyExcelinEdModel billDrafting legislation
Guaranteed Access to Advanced Mathematics FAQ and policy launchExcelinEdExplainerBriefing legislators
Middle School Advanced Math Course Requirements ActALECModel billDrafting legislation
Automatic Enrollment Policies for Advanced Coursework and fact sheetEdTrustExplainerDesign choices and reporting
Automatic enrollment hubEduProgress (Collaborative for Student Success)Advocacy hubCommunications materials
Automatic Enrollment in Advanced Courses: A Bipartisan ApproachJohns Hopkins UniversityResearch briefNorth Carolina results and design advice
Middle School Math Acceleration and Equitable Access to Eighth-Grade AlgebraDougherty et al., EEPA (2015)Peer-reviewed studyWake County placement effects
Objective course placement and college readinessDougherty et al., Economics of Education Review (2017)Peer-reviewed studyLonger-term outcomes
Leveling Up: A Behavioral Nudge to Increase Enrollment in Advanced Coursework and AIR summaryCALDER / AIRResearch paperWashington results
Targeted Acceleration in Middle School MathCard & Giuliano, NBER (2024)Research paperCollege and STEM degree effects
Unequal Access to 8th-Grade AlgebraNWEA (2025)Research briefNational access and placement gaps
Who Becomes an Inventor in America?Bell, Chetty et al., QJE (2019)Peer-reviewed studyWorkforce and innovation case
Proficient and Passed OverEdTrust-New York (2026)State analysisModel for a state gap analysis
How Ohio's brand-new advanced math policy will workFordham Institute (2026)Implementation guideOhio SB 19 design
Expanding Advanced Course Auto-Enrollment in Texas and WashingtonEducation Commission of the States (2025)Policy briefComparing two state models
Middle School Advanced Mathematics Program FAQTexas Education AgencySEA guidanceModel SEA implementation guidance
Advanced Mathematics Course Enrollment LegislationNorth Carolina Department of Public InstructionSEA guidance and dataAnnual placement reporting
HB 2686 implementation guidanceVirginia Department of EducationSEA guidanceTop-quartile model
ESEA Section 1003A, direct student servicesU.S. CodeFederal statuteFunding advanced courses
Dear Colleague letter on ESEA flexibility and waiversU.S. Department of Education (2025)Federal guidanceWaiver requests
Arkansas waiver approvalU.S. Department of Education (2026)Approved waiverModel for reducing duplicate testing

Other sources cited: E3 Alliance testimony on Texas SB 2124; SCORE on Tennessee's 2026 session; Indiana Capital Chronicle on HEA 1634; ESEA Section 1111; ESEA Section 4107; A Nation Empowered, Vol. 2, Ch. 2.

STEM Talent Action supports state and federal policies that identify and develop America's highest-potential students, regardless of zip code, income or background.