On this page
Bottom line for governors
A new governor can put thousands more high-scoring students into advanced math within one to two school years, at modest cost, by making advanced math the default for students who have already earned it on the state test. Eleven states have enacted some form of automatic enrollment, five of them in 2026 alone, in states led by Republicans, Democrats and divided governments, and most passed by wide bipartisan margins. Most states still let referrals, requests and course availability decide who takes Algebra I in 8th grade, the usual path to calculus by 12th grade and to degrees in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM).
Five actions a governor and transition team can take
- Sign an executive order in the first 30 days.Direct the state education agency (SEA) to publish placement data, issue opt-out guidance and use existing federal flexibilities. No legislation is needed for any of these.
- Make it law in the first session.Propose automatic enrollment legislation. Action 2 links to model bills from ExcelinEd and ALEC and to design guidance from EdTrust.
- Set SEA policy for districts.Require universal screening on the existing state test, standard parent notices and compacted middle school pathways.
- Publish the gap.Report every year how many top scorers are placed in advanced math, by school, district and student group, including family income and rural status.
- Extend the pipeline past Algebra.Use governor's schools, dual enrollment and state math competitions to keep top students moving.
The problem: ready students are left out
of schools in a 22-state sample offer algebra in 8th grade (NWEA, 2025)
New York 7th graders scored proficient but were not in Algebra 1 the next year (EdTrust-NY, 2026)
more likely to become an inventor if born to a top-1% family than a below-median one, at similar early scores (Bell, Chetty et al., 2019)
In most states, a strong score on the state math test does not guarantee a seat in advanced math. Placement usually depends on teacher recommendations, parent requests and whether the school offers the course at all. As a result, capable students, especially from low-income and rural families, are passed over more often than equally ready classmates, both in placement decisions and because their schools do not offer the course.
- Many schools do not offer the course. Only 58% of schools in a 22-state sample offered algebra by 8th grade, and fewer than half of high-poverty schools did (NWEA, 2025).
- Equal scores, unequal placement. Even among students in the top 20% of 5th-grade math achievers, the share who took algebra in 8th grade ranged from 60% to 84% depending on the student's background (NWEA, 2025).
- New York. In 2023-24, 58% of 7th graders scored proficient on the state math test, but only 37% of 8th graders in schools serving both grades took Algebra 1 the next year, leaving about 20,000 ready students out. More than one in four middle-grade schools (27%) do not offer Algebra 1 in 8th grade (EdTrust-New York, 2026).
- Ohio. Only 20% of students completed Algebra I by 8th grade in 2024 (Fordham Institute, 2026).
The cost shows up in the state's future workforce. Children from families in the top 1% of income are 10 times as likely to become inventors as children from families below the median, and differences in 3rd-grade math scores explain less than a third of that gap. That points to lost opportunity rather than lost ability (Bell, Chetty et al., Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019).
What automatic enrollment is, and what the evidence shows
top-scoring North Carolina 7th graders left out of Math I, before the 2018 law and in 2023 (Johns Hopkins, 2024)
share of Wake County, NC students in accelerated math after an objective placement rule replaced referrals (Dougherty et al., 2015)
girls earning a STEM bachelor's degree after entry to an accelerated middle school math track in a large Florida district (Card & Giuliano, 2024)
Automatic enrollment changes the default: a student who scores at or above a set level on the existing state math test is placed in the next advanced course unless a parent opts out. Teachers and parents can still recommend students who fall below the cutoff. No new test is needed, and the same number of students is taught. Johns Hopkins researchers expect the main costs to be short-term teacher training and, where a course is missing, a virtual or dual-enrollment option (Johns Hopkins, 2024).
The studies so far point the same way: more ready students are placed, gaps between equally skilled students shrink, and grades hold steady.
| Study | Setting | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Plucker, Berg & Kuwayama (Johns Hopkins, 2024) | North Carolina, statewide law (2018) | Top-scoring 7th graders not placed in Math I fell from about 10% before the law to 2% in 2023. In 2023-24, 94% of 58,186 eligible students in grades 6-12 were placed. |
| Dougherty et al. (Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2015) | Wake County, NC, objective placement rule | The share of students in accelerated math rose from about 40% to nearly 70%. The gap between low-income and other students with the same scores fell from 10.5 to 2-3 percentage points. |
| Dougherty et al. (Economics of Education Review, 2017) | Wake County, NC, follow-up | Acceleration raised later Precalculus enrollment by about one-seventh and improved college readiness. |
| Austin, Backes, Goldhaber et al. (CALDER/AIR, 2024) | Washington, district policies before the 2019 statewide law | Advanced course enrollment rose across subject areas. Qualified students from groups less likely to take advanced courses began to catch up, and GPAs and on-time graduation held steady. |
| Card & Giuliano (NBER, 2024) | Large urban Florida district, test-score cutoff for an accelerated track | Track entry raised algebra by 8th grade by about 20 percentage points and calculus enrollment by about 7 points. It nearly doubled the share of girls earning a STEM bachelor's degree. |
| E3 Alliance testimony (2024) | Texas, statewide law (2023) | Had the policy been in place earlier, an estimated 52,099 more 8th graders would have been placed in advanced math pathways in 2024-25 alone. |
Where states stand
Eleven states have enacted automatic enrollment in some form since North Carolina enacted the first statewide requirement in 2018, and eight of them did so in 2025 or 2026. Designs differ mainly on the cutoff (proficient, the top performance level, or the top 25-40% statewide), the starting grade and whether the requirement applies only "if available."
11 states have adopted automatic enrollment since 2018
8 of 11 acted in 2025–26. Each box is one state in the year its law passed; the figure above each year is the running total.
| State | Law | Who is automatically enrolled | Grades | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | HB 2423 (2026) | Highest proficiency on the state test or an aligned benchmark | 6-8 | Applies "if available"; parent may object |
| Georgia | HB 1030, Math Matters Act (2026) | Top ("distinguished") score on state end-of-grade or end-of-course test | 6-10 | Starts 2027-28; also requires 60 minutes of daily math in grades 4-5 |
| Iowa | SF 2220 (2026) | Advanced score on the grade 5-7 math test (pathway); advanced score plus a district readiness finding (next course) | Pathway from grade 5; next course in grades 4-12 | Applies from 2027-28; Algebra I by grade 9 at the latest; covers math and English language arts |
| Ohio | SB 19 (2026) | "Advanced" score, or "accomplished" plus an A/B or diagnostic score | 4-8 | Qualifying 6th graders take a compacted 7th/8th-grade course in grade 7, then Algebra I in grade 8; placements begin 2027-28 |
| Tennessee | SB 2375 / HB 2276 (2026) | "Exceeds expectations" on 7th-grade TCAP math | 8 | Algebra I (or equivalent) in grade 8 starting 2027-28; parent may opt out in writing; adds math licensure pathways |
| Indiana | HEA 1634 (2025) | "Above proficient" on ILEARN plus a C or better | Middle school | Starts 2026-27 |
| Virginia | HB 2686 (2025) | Top quartile statewide on math SOL | 5-8 | Applies if the course is offered; requires additional pathways in and annual parent notice |
| Kentucky | HB 190 (2025) | District may enroll "distinguished" scorers | 4-12 (district option) | Permissive, not required |
| Texas | SB 2124 (2023) | Top 40% on grade 5 STAAR, or a local measure | 6 | In effect since 2024-25 |
| Washington | HB 1599 (2019) | Meets state standard | High school | All districts since 2021-22; math, English language arts and science |
| North Carolina | HB 986 (2018) | Highest level on end-of-grade or end-of-course test | 6+ (advanced learning in 3-5) | A 2019 amendment added an annual state placement report |
Model policies are available from ExcelinEd and ALEC, and EdTrust supports the approach, so the policy has backing from organizations across the spectrum.
Action 1Sign an executive order in the first 30 days
An executive order can start the work months before a bill passes: it can direct state agencies to measure the gap, guide districts and use federal funds the state already receives. In states where the chief state school officer is elected or answers to a state board, the same directives can be framed as requests or a joint agreement.
The order should direct the SEA and partner agencies to:
- Measure the gap within 90 days. Publish how many top scorers in each school were placed in advanced math the following year, and which schools do not offer Algebra I in 8th grade.
- Issue opt-out guidance. Give districts a model placement policy, parent notice and compacted middle school pathway they can adopt under existing local authority.
- Use federal flexibilities. Under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), Section 1003A lets a state reserve up to 3% of its Title I-A allocation for direct student services, including advanced courses not offered at a student's school. Title IV-A (Section 4107) can fund advanced coursework and STEM enrichment. Section 1111(b)(2)(C) lets a state allow 8th graders in Algebra I to take the high school end-of-course test instead of the grade 8 test, provided they later take a more advanced math test in high school. The U.S. Department of Education has invited waiver requests for further flexibility. Arkansas's waiver, approved in July 2026, lets students in grades 5-8 who are enrolled in high school courses take end-of-course tests instead of grade-level tests.
- Close course gaps. Have the state virtual school or public university system offer the full math sequence free to any student whose school lacks the next course.
- Prepare a bill and budget request for the first legislative session.
Action 2Make it law in the first session
A statute makes the default permanent and statewide; guidance alone leaves placement to each district. The strongest laws set an objective cutoff, start early enough to reach Algebra I by grade 8, close the "if available" exemption and require public reporting.
| Provision | Recommended design | Precedent |
|---|---|---|
| Who qualifies | Highest performance level on the state math test, or top 25% statewide, whichever reaches more students. Districts may add local measures that qualify more students, never fewer. | NC (highest level), VA (top quartile), TX (top 40%) |
| When | Screen every year in grades 3-8 and high school. The key decision is at the end of grade 5, into a compacted grade 6 course. | TX (grade 5 to 6), OH (grades 4-8) |
| Pathway | Each district offers a sequence that lets qualified students finish Algebra I by the end of grade 8. | ExcelinEd model, OH |
| Course availability | No "if available" exemption. A school without the course provides it through the state virtual school, dual enrollment or a nearby school, phased in over two years. | AZ and VA apply only where the course is available |
| Parent choice | Parent may opt out in writing. Parent or teacher may opt a student in. | Opt-out in nearly all enacted states; opt-in routes vary (e.g., TX, VA, ExcelinEd and ALEC models) |
| Family notice | Plain-language notice in commonly spoken languages explaining the pathway and how to opt out. | AZ, GA, ExcelinEd model |
| Student supports | Extra help during the school day, such as tutoring or small-group instruction. | ExcelinEd model, GA |
| Testing | Accelerated grade 8 students take the end-of-course test instead of the grade-level test. | ESEA Section 1111(b)(2)(C); Arkansas waiver (grades 5-8) |
| Reporting | Annual public report by school, district and student group: eligible, placed, opted out, course not offered, and course results. | NC, VA, ExcelinEd model |
Model legislation
Start from one of the two published model bills, and check it against EdTrust's design guidance. ExcelinEd and ALEC offer ready-to-file bill text; EdTrust offers design principles rather than bill text.
| Model | Publisher | What it does | Use it for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guaranteed Access to Advanced Math Model Policy (2024), with FAQ and 2026 one-pager | ExcelinEd | Requires a middle school pathway that ends in Algebra I. Automatically enrolls students who score proficient or higher on the grade 5, 6 or 7 state test, or meet a local measure. Parents can opt out or opt in. Requires in-school supports and an annual report to the legislature by student group. | Bill text for a middle school math requirement |
| Middle School Advanced Math Course Requirements Act (finalized August 2026) | ALEC | Requires districts to offer Algebra I to all middle school students, with completion by grade 9. Automatically enrolls students who score at a set level on the grade 5, 6 or 7 state test. Parents can opt out or opt in. Requires parent notice and an annual SEA report to the legislature. | Bill text that pairs automatic enrollment with a universal Algebra I offering |
| Automatic Enrollment Policies for Advanced Coursework and fact sheet | EdTrust | Six conditions for success: a clear, data-backed rationale; yearly data; early family communication; multiple eligibility measures; starting before high school; and extending beyond math. | Checking any bill's design and reporting provisions |
Action 3Set SEA policy for districts
Much of what makes automatic enrollment work happens in SEA rules and guidance, which a governor can shape through appointments, the state board and the agency's budget. The SEA should set these expectations for districts:
- Universal screening on the existing state test. Review every student's score, not only referred students, and send each school its list of qualified students before spring scheduling. Consider local norms as an added route in for schools that score below the state average.
- Default placement with parent opt-out. Publish a model local policy and a plain-language parent notice that districts can adopt as is.
- A standard compacted pathway. Define course codes for a grade 6 or 7 compacted course that leads to Algebra I by grade 8, as Ohio now requires.
- Many routes in, one route out. Teacher recommendation, parent request and local measures can add students; only a parent can remove a qualified student.
- Credit by exam and mastery-based progression. Let students who show mastery of a course move on to the next one in that subject, including in elementary grades.
- Virtual and part-time enrollment. Let students who finish the most advanced course at their school take the next one online or at another school or college.
Action 4Publish the gap and reward growth at the top
Public reporting is one of the least expensive accountability tools a governor has. North Carolina's annual placement report showed district placement rates ranging from 33% to 100% of qualified students, showing the state where to focus help (Johns Hopkins, 2024). Publishing how many top scorers reach Algebra I the next year shows where placement is falling short.
- Report the placement rate. Each year, publish the share of top scorers placed in advanced math, by school, district and student group, including family income and urban, suburban or rural location, plus the schools that do not offer Algebra I in grade 8.
- Make high achievers a reported group. Report growth for students scoring at the top, not only proficiency rates.
- Give credit for advanced performance. Use a performance index in school ratings that counts advanced scores for more than proficient ones, which rewards schools for moving students ahead. Federal law, the Every Student Succeeds Act, leaves room for this.
- Track long-term outcomes. Use the state longitudinal data system to follow placed students through Algebra I results, calculus, college STEM majors and earnings.
Action 5Extend the pipeline past Algebra
Algebra I in grade 8 is the gateway, not the goal. Governors can also widen the routes that carry top students further.
- Calculus and dual enrollment for every high school. Use the state virtual school and public colleges so no student's math sequence ends because their school ran out of courses.
- Governor's schools and state STEM academies. Create or expand residential and summer programs, and admit students through universal screening rather than nominations alone.
- A state math competition network. Fund regional universities to run math circles and contests open to every qualified student, feeding state and national olympiad pipelines.
- Course access for advanced learners. Where states run course access programs or approved-provider lists, include accelerated math providers and university programs.
- Use the governor's platform. Name the goal in the State of the State and recognize districts with the highest placement rates.
First 100 days: checklist for transition teams
The sequence below gets a bill drafted, the data public and the first placements under way before next school year's schedules are set in spring.
Transition (before inauguration)
- Ask the SEA how many students scored at the top level on the latest state math test and how many took advanced math the next year.
- Check whether the state already has an automatic enrollment law and whether it is being followed.
- List which middle schools do not offer Algebra I in grade 8.
- Name a senior advisor to own the issue.
Days 1-30
- Sign the executive order (Action 1).
- Brief education committee chairs and the state board chair in both parties.
- Include automatic enrollment in the State of the State and the first budget.
Days 31-60
- File the bill (Action 2), starting from the ExcelinEd or ALEC model bill and the state's own test levels.
- Ask the SEA to draft the model local policy and parent notice.
- Meet superintendents from districts with the largest and smallest placement gaps.
Days 61-100
- Publish the first placement-gap report.
- Launch or expand the virtual course option for schools without Algebra I.
- Send each district its list of qualified students before course scheduling for next year.
Anticipated questions and responses
These questions come up in nearly every state, and states that have already acted have answers to each.
"Is this an unfunded mandate?"
The same number of students is taught. Johns Hopkins researchers expect the main costs to be short-term teacher training and online options where a course is missing (Johns Hopkins, 2024).
"Will students be pushed too fast and fail?"
Only students who already scored at the top are placed. In Washington, advanced enrollment rose with no drop in GPAs or on-time graduation (AIR, 2024).
"Does it take away local control?"
Parents keep the final say through opt-out, and teachers and districts can still add students. The law only removes the barriers that keep qualified students out.
"What if our schools don't offer the course?"
Pair the requirement with a statewide virtual option and a two-year phase-in, and report which schools lack the course.
"Does acceleration hurt students socially?"
Research syntheses find academic gains and small-to-moderate social-emotional gains from acceleration (A Nation Empowered, Vol. 2, Ch. 2).
"Does it mean more testing?"
It uses the state test students already take, and accelerated students can take the end-of-course test instead of the grade-level one.
"Why not remove advanced tracks so everyone takes the same course?"
Removing advanced options leaves families who can pay for tutoring or private school to accelerate on their own. Automatic enrollment widens access while keeping the option for every ready student.
Resources
Every resource below is public and linkable as of October 30, 2026. Enacted state laws are linked in the table under "Where states stand."
| Resource | Publisher | Type | Use it for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guaranteed Access to Advanced Math Model Policy | ExcelinEd | Model bill | Drafting legislation |
| Guaranteed Access to Advanced Mathematics FAQ and policy launch | ExcelinEd | Explainer | Briefing legislators |
| Middle School Advanced Math Course Requirements Act | ALEC | Model bill | Drafting legislation |
| Automatic Enrollment Policies for Advanced Coursework and fact sheet | EdTrust | Explainer | Design choices and reporting |
| Automatic enrollment hub | EduProgress (Collaborative for Student Success) | Advocacy hub | Communications materials |
| Automatic Enrollment in Advanced Courses: A Bipartisan Approach | Johns Hopkins University | Research brief | North Carolina results and design advice |
| Middle School Math Acceleration and Equitable Access to Eighth-Grade Algebra | Dougherty et al., EEPA (2015) | Peer-reviewed study | Wake County placement effects |
| Objective course placement and college readiness | Dougherty et al., Economics of Education Review (2017) | Peer-reviewed study | Longer-term outcomes |
| Leveling Up: A Behavioral Nudge to Increase Enrollment in Advanced Coursework and AIR summary | CALDER / AIR | Research paper | Washington results |
| Targeted Acceleration in Middle School Math | Card & Giuliano, NBER (2024) | Research paper | College and STEM degree effects |
| Unequal Access to 8th-Grade Algebra | NWEA (2025) | Research brief | National access and placement gaps |
| Who Becomes an Inventor in America? | Bell, Chetty et al., QJE (2019) | Peer-reviewed study | Workforce and innovation case |
| Proficient and Passed Over | EdTrust-New York (2026) | State analysis | Model for a state gap analysis |
| How Ohio's brand-new advanced math policy will work | Fordham Institute (2026) | Implementation guide | Ohio SB 19 design |
| Expanding Advanced Course Auto-Enrollment in Texas and Washington | Education Commission of the States (2025) | Policy brief | Comparing two state models |
| Middle School Advanced Mathematics Program FAQ | Texas Education Agency | SEA guidance | Model SEA implementation guidance |
| Advanced Mathematics Course Enrollment Legislation | North Carolina Department of Public Instruction | SEA guidance and data | Annual placement reporting |
| HB 2686 implementation guidance | Virginia Department of Education | SEA guidance | Top-quartile model |
| ESEA Section 1003A, direct student services | U.S. Code | Federal statute | Funding advanced courses |
| Dear Colleague letter on ESEA flexibility and waivers | U.S. Department of Education (2025) | Federal guidance | Waiver requests |
| Arkansas waiver approval | U.S. Department of Education (2026) | Approved waiver | Model for reducing duplicate testing |
Other sources cited: E3 Alliance testimony on Texas SB 2124; SCORE on Tennessee's 2026 session; Indiana Capital Chronicle on HEA 1634; ESEA Section 1111; ESEA Section 4107; A Nation Empowered, Vol. 2, Ch. 2.
STEM Talent Action supports state and federal policies that identify and develop America's highest-potential students, regardless of zip code, income or background.